DISQUS

Both Sides of the Table: Is it Time for You to Earn or to Learn?

  • tristan walker · 1 month ago
    fantastic fantastic fantastic advice
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    thanks, tristan. now go learn so when you're ready to earn I can fund you! ;-)
  • ShanaC · 1 month ago
    Let's push this further-

    I'm going to be an undergraduate alum of where you went to B-school. It's definetely time for me to learn. I have a wierd situation due to my deparetment in which I finish classes in 5 weeks, but don'tgraduate until june. You know this scene- do you stay in Chicago? What is here? Or SHould I go and also be working towards my undergraduate,, knowing how crazy the undergraduates are?

    (And We Are)
  • Ryan Graves · 1 month ago
    Tristan-
    Take a screen shot of Marks comment and hold him to it :)
  • Jamie Hamilton · 1 month ago
    Thanks for sharing this Mark. I am very much in the learning stage so I was glad to stumble upon this article. I was recently offered .5% profit sharing as a Senior VP of a pre-revenue startup (not intended to be VC based). I would only be obligated to work 15 hours a week, but the catch is that there is no salary offered. I am wondering how having no salary might change your metrics? Was a meager salary one of your underlying assumptions in the above examples?

    I like it because I would be 'punching above my weight', and because it is an idea that I would like to be associated with. However it will likely take a couple few years to get going, so as much as I enjoy learning, it could be a mistake..I guess the question to ask would be if I get no cash back, would it have still been worth it..

    Is there anywhere I can find standard-ish compensation plans for startups, pre and post money?
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Assume that you'll make zero cash from your 0.5%. It is the most likely outcome. Now, would you do that 15 hours / week just for the experience? If yes, proceed. But it this way, many people pay to learn (e.g. for college or a masters degree). So if you think that this job will be a great learning experience I wouldn't worry about putting in the hours. I guess you could see it as an internship. But know why you're doing it - and don't stay too long!
  • alexlmiller · 1 month ago
    Great post Mark, really puts the benefit of learning vs. earning into perspective (especially when considering how high up you have to be to have the chance of making truly serious money from a sale).

    Question that comes to my mind: For young people - do you suggest going the 'learn' route first to try and get the opening or jump straight into an 'earn' position since they can take risks. I know for me I decided to take the learn route (hence who I decided to work for).

    Either way, certainly know who's door I'm knocking on for career advice now.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    For most young people I suggest the "learn" route initially provided they do meaningful roles rather than being paper pushers. I think most young folks don't have the skills to run a company successfuly so being close to others is a chance to learn. But ... if you want to run your own show some day (not everybody does) then I suggest to people to try before your 35. After that it just gets harder because you have more life commitments. But ... after 35 you can always fly in as CEO to an existing entity if you're proven yourself enough at more junior roles.
  • david · 1 month ago
    Good post, Mark.
  • Seph · 1 month ago
    Was having this exact discussion last night.
  • purusho · 1 month ago
    Nice post ' Dude ' :)
  • green18t · 1 month ago
    Great advice - I believe the complete phrase was "run for the hills" :)
  • theprivateequiteer · 1 month ago
    Very similar to the issue in private equity firms; you do the math for most mid-market positions, and the carried interest is nothing to write home about. Yet people flock to private equity on stories of carry payments in KKR and Carlyle, not realizing that like every industry, there are fairytale cases. I recently walked through a calculation on The Private Equiteer (see http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/in-it-for-mor...).
  • Jts2004 · 1 month ago
    I have a question- what would you advise to a twenty-four year old who has served for a year at a very small company with the desire to lead, but no room for career growth? I've only been there a year, but am confident I've learned all I will in my current position. I have an opportunity to join a rapidly growing company as a part of a brand new team, though it would be much of the same grain of work as my current job. I also have an opportunity to partner with an experienced business and marketing executive to lead the creative development for a startup.

    I feel like my resume could use the established company to 'learn', but my gut leans to the startup to 'earn', because I know it is what I am passionate about (the type of work, not the money). In my industry, it is always time to 'learn'. But most of what I know I have taught myself.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Without the details I can't give you precise feedback but let me say the following:
    - you know when you aren't learning any more. Most people fall into a habit of just staying put.
    - if you have a chance to move to a new role in your current company and continue to learn go for it
    - if you can't it's time to look around. I would warn you (and others) that job hopping is also a problem. When I see people who worked for 5 companies in 6 years I usually won't hire them. No loyalty. So as with everything in life it's a balance
    - as for when it is right to try and go earn - it's a personal decision. Most 24 year olds aren't ready to run their own show. But then there's Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates who go and prove us all wrong.

    Good luck!
  • Bob Schwartz · 1 month ago
    OUTSTANDING!
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Thanks, Bob. Living so close it's a shame we never meet in person. Let's rectify that!
  • Willan · 1 month ago
    Great post Mark. One nuance I have often used when looking at opportunities is trying to determine the size of the opportunity. In other words, taking a #2-3 slot at a company with the possibility of a $500M outcome (because of the size of market the company is tackling) might be more valuable (and monetarily rewarding) than the #1 position at a company that might be more of a niche market play (and thus an exit of $50M would be exciting). However, this does turn to a little bit of a guessing game (and one is never quite as smart as they think they are in making these choices). And if your stats are true that "1,500 deals get funded / year in the US, 80 eventually sell for $50 million and only 8 eventually sell for $150 million+" then regardless of how you answer the question, the reality is that most will be learning rather than earning :-)
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    If I'm honest I don't actually agree with your premise. Let me elaborate
    - almost no companies achieve $500 million exits. So your chances of being at that company are small. Even if you are your chances of holding on to your role (ask anyone who joined Facebook early), not getting diluted, etc. are small
    - on the other hand, being the CEO of a small company gives you all the freedom in the world. If you run the show, for the most part you decide when and how to exit. If you don't raise too much money and 4 years in get an offer for $15 million but you own 45% of the company that's a pretty great outcome for most people. Do the math on what that would take in most other scenarios.
    - the key advice I give to people who are ready to be the #1 is ... when you're ready go for it. If you're number 2 and you want to exit at $15 million but the CEO wants to shoot for the moon - guess who wins!
  • scottshapiro · 1 month ago
    As an MBA student thinking about post-MBA career strategy, this is a very helpful framework!

    Great post!
  • awaldstein · 1 month ago
    Mark, good post and sage advice. As a serial start-up guy, I would add that winning comes in tw0 flavors--the dollars of course but also carrying forward the experience of being part of a winning team. Reputation carries you a long way and nothing builds reputation like a win.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    I agree 100%. I say this all the time to people, "chalk one up in the W column. Then figure out what next."
  • vrikhter · 1 month ago
    I think Marc Andreessen said something similar in regards to VC investments that make it big every year; 10-15 funded companies per year account for 97% of all exits. I may have butchered that a little bit, but it's in parallel with the investment comment you made above.
  • reecepacheco · 1 month ago
    Love it. Particularly you're advice given to people joining your companies early on. Very helpful for me as we hire.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Yeah, I found that while tempting to not have the honest discussions up front about the value of stock options, it's always best to have employees who join for the right reasons and have the right expectations.
  • Juney Ham · 1 month ago
    Great post Mark.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Thanks, Juney. Now, in your case ... GO EARN !!! ;-)
  • Youssef Rahoui · 1 month ago
    Excellent, thanks.
  • Logan Ward · 1 month ago
    GREAT post! Thanks for the insight.
  • Rokhayakebe · 1 month ago
    I say, Earn while you learn.

    Start your company. You will definitely learn, and you will still have a 1 in 30 (arbitrary chosen) chance at earning.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Well, it depends on your skill sets. No reason to raise friends & family money if you don't have the idea, experience or talent. I'd much rather tap people for money when I know what I'm doing. But directionally I know what you mean. My advice, sooner rather than later but not too early.
  • Chris · 1 month ago
    Mark
    Topic is right on and relevant to a lot of people. I wish the article went one step further. I am interested to see if there is a calculator that anyone knows of that can tell you based on the share pool, stock owned and valuation of the company what the net results would be if your company sold for $XM. Of course there would be some simplifications/assumptions but that would be valuable to a non-finance guy/gal.
    Thanks for continuing the series on Startup Advice. And I enjoyed hearing you on #TWIST.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Thanks, Chris. Do a search for cap table at www.venturehacks.com - I think they have some stuff.

    But here's what you need to do:
    - know the "fully diluted number of shares"
    - know how many you own (e.g. the "% ownership of fully diluted shares")
    - know how much money was raised in total and what the terms of the liquidation preferences are. This is complicated but VentureHacks and Brad Feld's site have great info www.feld.com
    - when the company is sold (different in an IPO) the investors take their money back first. Depending on the liquidation preferences they make take more. This is more complicated because if the company sells for a very high price they MAY not take a liquidation preference. You really have to understand LP to do this calculation.
    - Then you can begin to calculate how much you'd own of the remaining company. You also need to know whether you're vested and if not vested whether you have "acceleration on a change of control"
    - It would be hard to build a calculator without knowing the terms of the company but at a high level this is the process.
  • Davide Di Cillo · 1 month ago
    Saved in my "good advises" backpack.
  • John Hawekotte · 1 month ago
    Mark -

    You should check to see if you might be entitled to state and federal tax refunds for the last few years. The maximum tax on long-term capital gains in California is 24.3% --- 15% federal and 9.3% state.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    The issue isn't with long-term capital gains taxes, it's with short-term capital gains taxes. For stock option plans to be categorized as long-term you need to have exercised your stock and held it for one-year before selling. This almost never happens. So most people get stuck with short-term capital gains taxes. In CA these come out to 42.5% approximately all in.
  • John Hawekotte · 1 month ago
    I agree, but I was addressing (in an obnoxious way, now that I look at it) your comment:

    "... so you’ll likely be taxed at a long-term capital gains rate. In California that averages around 42.5% so in my state after tax you’d make an extra $18,000 / year and that’s in a positive scenario!"

    Your commentary is quite insightful, which is what should be expected from the best VC blogger in the genre.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Gotcha. Sorry, I was being dense. Didn't realize you were pointing out a typo. I'll go fix that now.
  • r4i · 1 month ago
    Thanx for the valuable information. This was just the thing I was looking for, simply fantastic post man...... keep posting. Will be visiting back soon.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Thank you for stopping by and I appreciate the feedback.
  • Mark Essel · 1 month ago
    Instead of the either or, I believe the top earners never stop learning.
    Learning is part of their DNA.

    In fact, they begin to value learning much more than $$. After understanding the foundations of business development, startup cycles, outside investors, and building multiple successful companies what's the point of more earning?

    It's only the folks that haven't learned or earned enough yet, that get blinded by earnings. It's not the capital, it's what you can do with it that makes you a great founder.

    Either way, great post. Got me thinking and I appreciate it.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    I agree with you 100%. My broader point is that too many people are looking to "learn" as in working in a more junior role in a company rather than learn from being the CEO (or other top executive) where the could earn while they learn. The best people are never done learning.
  • farhanlalji · 1 month ago
    The difficult thing is making the transition between the learn and earn, and I'd add the burn situations.

    Burn - being in a big company thinking you're going to learn and leverage your lessons into your start up career.

    Doing the hard stop from the burn to learn or earn is difficult.

    If you're in a learn situation and the founders swinging for the moon you're in it for a while and next thing you know you've got a mortgage and mouths to feed which makes leaving to go do the earn thing difficult.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Yes, it's hard to try to "earn" while you have mouths to feed. It's why I encourage people to try when they don't have encumbrances.
  • jaredhecht · 1 month ago
    This is the most useful and relevant post I've read in months. Thank you.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Thank you for the feedback.
  • djdan85 · 1 month ago
    Great post. The simple math is powerful yet often overlooked!
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Funnily enough, most people don't even bother to do the math. I always wonder why.
  • Bogdan Ionita · 1 month ago
    Whenever I hire people for my company, I always tell them that I will not keen at all to offer them stock options or any other similar long-term shady 'benefits'. I would very much prefer to give them a higher salary or better bonuses (things that employees can 'taste' for real).

    Although stock options may help the employee feel more involved in the business (which is something that I would like, as the company founder), in the vast majority of real-world cases it's just a BS due to the same calculation point that you made in your article. And I do my best to explain it to them. To me, it is more of an employer's trick than a real benefit.

    Indeed, there are people that wouldn't want to get involved unless they are offered stock options. If it's really a must-have for them, so be it.

    About learning vs earning, I totally agree that the way to go is to start your own company or to get to be a senior exec. But you shouldn't try to learn 'everything' before you start your own company. I often see people that are "not yet prepared" to start a company. If they don't do it soon, most of them will never be prepared. You should start it trying to earn as much as possible from it, but most likely you will end up learning a lot from it... probably more than you would learn by working for somebody else.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Thanks, Bogdan. I agree people should try the "earn" route to "learn" even before they've learned everything. I also agree about hard cash. I often find that employees in startups don't appreciate soft benefits.
  • Jimmy Hendricks · 1 month ago
    This is great. In the first year I had several talks with my co-founder about this topic. The risk is higher doing it on our own I said, but if we fail we will have learned a lot more starting something than working alongside someone else.
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Too true.
  • LukeG · 1 month ago
    Great piece.

    In my own limited experience, it feels like I've learned more in the 18 months since starting a company than I have in the rest of my life. If you're in a position to bring together a team and take a shot at a promising opportunity AND you're young enough that your opportunity cost is pretty low, I highly, highly recommend it. There are few situations in the world that will lead to as much personal growth and professional development *in terms of true capability.* If you're trying to climb a corp ladder, it's a much riskier approach.

    (I worked at a bootstrapped startup in college and for a venture-back co for a year after graduating. Both were important but can't even begin to compare to this.)
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Luke, where people have the right skills sets I totally agree with you. But some people just don't have a natural predilection for business so would benefit by working with other talented people before branching out on their own.
  • dsev · 1 month ago
    Hi
    greatly enjoyed your article, just a quick question -
    i graduated with a business/computers degree and am currently looking for a job.
    i have been offered two opportunities - one at an established dev firm and another at a startup - both doing dev work.
    at this point the earnings wont be great at either.

    im not sure where i would be able to learn better?

    thanks
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    There is no one size fits all here. Without details it would be irresponsible for me to advise. I would say you should look for the place where you feel a better fit with:
    - the people you'll be working with and;
    - the kind of work they've told you you'll be involved with

    Good luck.
  • scheng1 · 1 month ago
    That's true. There was a lecturer in college who mentioned that we should work at McDonald as a crew member and to learn about business management!
  • msuster · 1 month ago
    Ok, maybe that's one step too far ;-)